The Practice of Categorizing
Case Study: Laptop
Purchase
In professional communications it is sometimes necessary to categorize, or demonstrate one's thought process in written form. The activity listed here demonstrates the practice of categorization, using the purchase of a laptop computer as the activity being analyzed. Using categories such as classification or partitioning to identify various features, functions, and benefits of an object, issue, or process, can assist in determining direction, or enhance the effectiveness of one's communicative efforts.
When looking to purchase a computer, one must
consider which features are most important such as size, software, battery
life, and memory. Lannon recommends using the techniques of classification (dealing with an
assortment) and partitioning (dealing
with specific features), to empower one to better sort and select (2008). Beginning
by placing contending computers into four classifications such as a) desktop, b) laptop, c) netbook, and d) tablet, helps one to better consider practicality and purpose of each before
purchasing.
For example, if one requires
mobility and compact screen size, selections classified as desktop (category A) fail to meet this preference. However, this
single criterion still leaves three classifications “on the table”, so to speak. The Best Buy (2012) internet site alone
provides multiple options in these categories; therefore, in addition to mobility one may require full computing functionality, in which
case tablets (category D), can also
be removed from the list of possibilities. To make my selection, I began
classifying laptops by function (i.e. gaming,
school, professional, and general applications).
After selecting the general application group as my best option, I partitioned
the laptops by various features: audio-visual
quality, software applications, battery life, and memory.
- Gaming
and Entertainment
- Higher
RAM (8 – 16GB)
- Highest
graphics and sound quality
- Greater
hard drive capacity (500 – 899GB)
- Wireless
internet connection and standard battery life (3 – 4hrs.)
- No
academic software
- School
- Standard
RAM (4 – 6GB)
- Standard
graphics and sound
- Wireless
internet connection and standard battery life (3 – 4hrs.)
- Moderate
hard drive capacity (350 – 500GB)
- Discounted software bundles (e.g. Windows 7, Microsoft Office for Students)
- Professional
- Moderate
RAM (4 – 8GB)
- Intermediate
graphics and sound card
- Wireless
internet connection and long lasting battery life (>5hrs.)
- Standard
hard drive capacity (300 – 400GB)
- Light
weight (5.5 lbs. or less)
- General
- Moderate
RAM (4 – 8GB)
- Moderate
hard drive space (500 – 750GB)
- Intermediate
graphics and sound card
- Wireless
internet connection and moderate battery life (4 – 5hrs.)
- Discounted
software (e.g. Turbo Tax, Microsoft Office Standard)
- Moderate weight (5.5 – 6.5 lbs.)
1. Toshiba
o 15.6” diagonal display and Dolby Advanced Audio
o Windows 7 Home Premium
o Five hour battery life
o 640 GB hard drive and AMD Quad-Core 6GB processor (Best Buy, 2012)
2. HP
o 15.6” diagonal display and Beats Audio
o Windows 7 Home Premium
o Six hour battery life
o 640 GB hard drive and Vision 8 Processor
3. ASUS
o Windows 7 Home Premium and Microsoft Office 2010
o 10 hour extended battery life
o 750 GB hard drive space and i7 Intel Core processor (ASUS, 2012)
Conclusion
By categorizing my selections into four specific classifications
(e.g. gaming, school, professional, and generic application), and then
partitioning my preferred classification into components (e.g. screen size and
CPU) I was better able to determine which system would best suit my needs. I
opted for the ASUS laptop as it had all of the major
features I was most interested in obtaining (e.g. portability, software bundle,
extended battery life, and extensive memory and processing speed). In today’s technologically advanced marketplace and demanding business environment, limiting selections by applying specific criteria such as
classifications (i.e. what, where, and how), and then partitioning similar possibilities
(by parts or make) are excellent strategies to sort and examine options
(Lannon, 2008). By applying these methods over the weekend, I was able to
select an affordable computer that met my personal, professional, and
scholastic needs.
Reference
Lannon, J. M. (2008). Technical communication
(11th ed.). New York: Longman.
Unknown (2012). ASUS notebooks. Retrieved on June 3, 2012, from: http://www.asus.com/ Notebooks/Superior_Mobility/U46E/#specifications
Unknown (2012). Best Buy computers. Retrieved on June 2, 2012, from: http://www.bestbuy.
com/site/Electronics/Computers-PCs/abcat0500000.c?id=abcat0500000
Unknown (2014). Image: Laptops. Retrieved from: http://cdn3.pcadvisor.co.uk/cmsdata/features/3361263/mid-range_Laptops_buying_advice_496x331.jpg
Unknown (2014). Image: Laptops. Retrieved from: http://cdn3.pcadvisor.co.uk/cmsdata/features/3361263/mid-range_Laptops_buying_advice_496x331.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment